> What's the reasoning behind putting -DINET6 into the default > compiler options of the generic Makefile ? I believe the sole reason is that the author of the patch didn't know how to get it into pyconfig.h. itojun recently confirmed that all uses of the INET6 can be replaced with ENABLE_IPV6, and that the define may go away. I hesitate to change that, though, since some of the IPv6 implementations *may* require that INET6 is defined when processing the "system" headers (not all IPv6 implementations we support actually come with the operating system). > I'm just asking because such a define will be inherited by > all extensions being compiled with distutils and the Makefile.pre.in > setup process... sounds like trouble if you ask me. What kind of trouble? > Shouldn't the define be placed into the pyconfig.h file or > only in those extensions which need it ? Wouldn't it cause the same trouble there? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4