Hello everybody, > 2X on pystone is nothing to snort at -- it's good! Thanks, but I believe that much better results can be obtained. However, I have a problem here. I am starting to run out of free time for Psyco. I would like to put efforts in helping people understand how Psyco works, so that it can be developped up to a really usable state -- it is currently more of a proof-of-concept, but it would be just too bad to loose this opportunity, I guess. Besides, I believe that with some more work we could really turn the current version into something great. That's just too much for me alone now (I should be doing a math Ph.D. these days you know ;-). So my request is, Does anyone feel like investing some time in Psyco just on the basis of the current preliminary results ? Shall I write a technical in-depth overview ? A bientot, Armin.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4