Skip:
> scope:
> l = [i**2 for i in range(10)]
By analogy with C, the introducer of a new scope should
simply be an unadorned colon:
:
l = [i**2 for i in range(10)]
:-)
While this might be useful, it doesn't really address the issue
raised, because we really need a new scope per listcomp (or
maybe even each 'for' in the listcomp).
> There's also the problem of how to export results from the scope, though
> perhaps the new nested scope stuff provides a solution to that.
Nope -- there's still no way to assign to any name in
an intermediate scope. Something heretical, such as
declarations, would be needed.
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a |
Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. |
greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4