Tim Peters <tim.one@home.com>:
> My position will be that nothing ships in the distribution unless copyright
> has been assigned to the PSF, or the contributor has agreed to give the PSF
> a non-exclusive irrevocable etc license to release their work under the PSF
> license du jour. Fleshing out the second option so as to prevent abuse on
> either side is going to require significant effort ("what if the PSF goes
> away?", "what if the PSF changes its license to something I hate?", "what if
> I change my mind?", etc).
>
> Unfortunately, significant effort takes significant time too, and nobody has
> started on this yet.
I think a PSF pleadge to use only an OSI-certified license would address
some of these issues. Write it into the bylaws if necessary.
--
<a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from
oppression: for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that
will reach unto himself.
-- Thomas Paine
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4