On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 10:32:48PM +0100, Michael Hudson wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2001, Tim Peters wrote: > > Next question: why isn't builtin_len using METH_OLDARGS instead? Is > > there some advantage to using METH_VARARGS in this case? > So you can't do > >>> len(1,2) > 2 > a la list.append, socket.connect pre 2.0? (or was it 1.6?) And don't forget the method-specific errormessage by passing ':len' in the format string. Of course, this can easily be (and probably should) done by passing another argument to whatever parses arguments in METH_O, rather than invoking string parsing magic every call. -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4