A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-May/014945.html below:

[Python-Dev] explanations for more pybench slowdowns

[Python-Dev] explanations for more pybench slowdowns [Python-Dev] explanations for more pybench slowdownsJeremy Hylton jeremy@digicool.com
Mon, 21 May 2001 19:13:09 -0400 (EDT)
We looked at the SecondImport test case today.  It's a good test case
for programs that execute "import os" in a time-critical inner loop
:-).

The primary reason it is slower is the import lock that was added
after 1.5.2.  The benchmark, run in isolation, spends about 6 percent
of its time in the locking code.  Since it only spends about 20
percent of its time actually doing imports, this is a pretty
substantial cost.

It seems possible to eliminate some of the cost by using a special
marker in sys.modules that means: "This is not a module, but it's
being loaded by another thread."  But Guido doesn't sound interested
in optimizing programs with imports in inner loops.

Jeremy




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4