On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 11:27:39AM -0400, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > (I guess he means the buffer is alloc'ed contiguously with the dict > > > object head. That's often a nice strategy. Could do that for small > > > lists too maybe, except those haven't gotten anybody's attention just > > > yet.) > > > > Sounds to me like it would benifit tuples even more than lists or dicts. At > > least in my code, I see more short tuples than short lists, and they are > > usually not altered after creation ;-) > > Which is why tuples already have this feature. > > Posted before your first cup of coffee? :-) No, after my last meeting, before my first witbier of the friday-afternoon-office-beer-binge :) TGIF ;) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4