> > (I guess he means the buffer is alloc'ed contiguously with the dict > > object head. That's often a nice strategy. Could do that for small > > lists too maybe, except those haven't gotten anybody's attention just > > yet.) > > Sounds to me like it would benifit tuples even more than lists or dicts. At > least in my code, I see more short tuples than short lists, and they are > usually not altered after creation ;-) Which is why tuples already have this feature. Posted before your first cup of coffee? :-) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4