> Anybody care to take a stab at making the new richcmp and/or coerce
> code ugly again?
When stepping through the code, I also missed support for the
relationship between identity and equality. E.g. in
PyObject_RichCompare, I'd expect
if (v == w) {
switch (op)
case Py_EQ:case Py_LE:case Py_GE:
Py_INCREF(Py_True);
return Py_True;
case Py_NE:case Py_LT:case Py_GT:
Py_INCREF(Py_False);
return Py_False;
}
}
That would not help in your case, of course. I don't even know how
frequent comparing identical objects is in real life - but this is
something that PyObject_Compare has that PyObject_RichCompare
currently doesn't.
Regards,
Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4