>>>>> "M" == M <mal@lemburg.com> writes:
M> True. The main source of documentation for Unicode still is the
M> proposal itself (Misc/unicode.txt). It needs some reordering
M> and a few examples, but does contain all the information needed
M> to grasp what the implementation intends and how it works.
As a first step, why not PEP-ify that document, much like as has been
done with the DB-API (version 1 & 2)? It can be an informational PEP.
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4