On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:57:59AM -0400, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote: [ Fred violates Tim's Rule #1 (don't ever use 'foo' for anything) and gets bitten in the derriere ] > This begs the question, though -- should tests that create temp > files check that the files don't already exist, and fail with a more > descriptive error if they do? I'd think so, yes. I'd also suggest nothing uses something as lamenamed as 'foo', 'test' or 'spam' -- I'm sure Tim will agree with me, at least on the first account :) How about mmap calls its test-testfile 'test_mmap.foo' ? -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4