>>>>> "PP" == Paul Prescod <paulp@ActiveState.com> writes: PP> I would like to argue that "plain old C types" should act as if PP> they have __dict__s for consistency with other types. It is PP> sometimes useful to be able to annotate objects by adding PP> attributes to them. But this only works with class instance PP> objects, not instances of types. Every type should have an __dict__ of type dict? Then every dict must have an __dict__, including the __dict__ of __dict__? Once every object has an __dict__, every object will be mutable. Then no object will be usable as a dict key and we can get rid of dict's entirely. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4