>>>>> "JE" == Jeff Epler <jepler@inetnebr.com> writes:
>> class X (Y rename foo as _sfoo, bar as _sbar ):
| Why not let us spell this as:
| class X(Y):
| from Y import foo as _sfoo, bar as _sbar
| ...
>>>>> "NS" == Neil Schemenauer <nas@python.ca> writes:
NS> This already has a meaning in Python. Paul's suggested syntax
NS> is pretty neat, IMHO.
Not if Y is a class though, right? That would currently raise an
ImportError, so why not hijack it for this purpose? I think it has a
natural and clear enough meaning without requiring additional
keywords, or complicating the base class specification syntax.
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4