mal wrote:
> Gustavo Niemeyer submitted a patch which adds a tokenize like
> method to strings and Unicode:
>
> "one, two and three".tokenize([",", "and"])
> -> ["one", " two ", "three"]
>
> I like this method -- should I review the code and then check it in ?
-1. method bloat. not exactly something you do every day, and
when you do, it's a one-liner:
def tokenize(string, ignore):
[word for word in re.findall("\w+", string) if not word in ignore]
> PS: Haven't gotten any response regarding the .decode() method yet...
> should I take this as "no objections" ?
-0. method bloat. we don't have asfloat methods on integers and
asint methods on strings either...
Cheers /F
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4