On Wed, 2 May 2001, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > <none> > > o Object > > o Class > > o MetaClass > > o ObjectMetaClass > > o ClassMetaClass > > o MetaClassMetaClass > > > > Object is the top of the class hierarchy (and total hierarchy). It has no > > superclass. It is the only class that has no superclass. > > Class is a subclass of Object. > > MetaClass is a subclass of Class. > > > > ObjectMetaClass is also a subclass of Class. > > ClassMetaClass is a subclass of ObjectMetaClass. > > MetaClassMetaClass is a subclass of ClassMetaClass. Does this go on ad infinitum? ie, is there a ClassMetaClassMetaClass which sublcasses MetaClassMetaClass and so on? I was under the impression from talking to JimF that Smalltalk eventually stopped at a class that is a subclass of itself. -Michel
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4