> (any special reason why frame objects don't contain a > pointer to the corresponding function/method object?) Because (until now) there was no need. The frame needs to know about the code object, but the rest of the function's context is not needed. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4