/F:
> guido wrote:
>
> > > class MyClass (BaseClass):
> > > def foo (self, arg1, arg2):
> > > super.foo(arg1, arg2)
> >
> > I'm sure that's everybody's favorite way to spell it!
>
> not mine. my brain contains far too much Python 1.5.2 code
> for it to accept that some variables are dynamically scoped,
> while others are lexically scoped.
>
> why not spell it out:
>
> self.__super__.foo(arg1, arg2)
>
> or
>
> self.super.foo(arg1, arg2)
>
> or
>
> super(self).foo(arg1, arg2)
IMO we still need to specify the class, and there we are:
super(self, MyClass).foo(arg1, arg2)
Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4