> > If we can find a way to spell "super.method", we should be ready for > > the future. I can't think of something right off the bat > > unfortunately. > > Could we make > > super(self, MyBaseClass).foo(arg, ...) > > behave similar to > > MyBaseClass.foo(self, arg, ...) > > Wrapping this stuff in a function would probably also > enable to use the same pattern in existing python versions. Yes, I can see how to write super() using current tools (or 1.5.2 even). The problem is that this makes super calls even more wordy than they already are! I can't think of anything that wouldn't require compiler support though. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4