A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-March/013912.html below:

(Don't Read If You're Busy With 2.1b2) "Rich" Comparisons?

[Python-Dev] Re: (Don't Read If You're Busy With 2.1b2) "Rich" Comparisons? [Python-Dev] Re: (Don't Read If You're Busy With 2.1b2) "Rich" Comparisons?Ka-Ping Yee ping@lfw.org
Sat, 24 Mar 2001 05:33:05 -0800 (PST)
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> So given a subset of a lattice, it may not have a maximum, but it will
> always have a supremum. It appears that the Python max function
> differs from the mathematical maximum in that respect: max will return
> a value, even if that is not the "largest value"; the mathematical
> maximum might give no value.

Ah, but in Python most collections are usually finite. :)


-- ?!ng




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4