On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 02:52:28 -0500, "Tim Peters" <tim.one@home.com> wrote:
> Believe me, we would not have shipped 2.1b2 if it failed any of the std tests
> (and I ran the whole suite 8 ways: with and without nuking all .pyc/.pyo
> files first, with and without -O, and under release and debug builds).
>
> > I don't know what it was supposed to be, but .split() without an
> > argument splits on whitespace. best guess is "1.9".split('.') ??
>
> On my box that line is:
>
> __version__ = "$Revision: 1.9 $".split()[1]
>
> So this is this some CVS retrieval screwup?
Probably.
But nobody cares about your machine <1.9 wink>
In the Py2.1b2 you shipped, the line says
'''
__version__ = "1.9".split()[1]
'''
It's line 18.
That, or someone managed to crack one of the routers from SF to me.
should-we-start-signing-our-releases-ly y'rs, Z.
--
"I'll be ex-DPL soon anyway so I'm |LUKE: Is Perl better than Python?
looking for someplace else to grab power."|YODA: No...no... no. Quicker,
-- Wichert Akkerman (on debian-private)| easier, more seductive.
For public key, finger moshez@debian.org |http://www.{python,debian,gnu}.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4