Uche Ogbuji wrote:
>
> > > At IPC9, Guido put up a poll of likely use of stackless features, and it was a
> > > pretty clear arithmetic progression from those who wanted to use microthreads,
> > > to those who wanted co-routines, to those who wanted just generators. The
> > > generator folks were probably 2/3 of the assembly. Looks as if many have
> > > decided, and they seem to agree with you.
> >
> > Here the exact facts of the poll:
> >
> > microthreads: 26
> > co-routines: 35
> > generators: 44
> >
> > I think this reads a little different.
>
> Either you're misreading me or I'm misreading you, because your facts seem to
> *exactly* corroborate what I said. 26 -> 35 -> 44 is pretty much an
> arithmetic progression, and it's exactly in the direction I mentioned
> (microthreads -> co-routines -> generators), so what difference do you see?
>
> Of course my 2/3 number is a guess. 60 - 70 total people in the room strikes
> my memory rightly. Anyone else?
You are right, I was misunderstanding you. I thought 2/3rd of
all votes were in favor of generators, while my picture
is "most want generators, but the others are of comparable
interest".
sorry - ciao - chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer@tismer.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaunstr. 26 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14163 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
where do you want to jump today? http://www.stackless.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4