> > At IPC9, Guido put up a poll of likely use of stackless features, and it was a > > pretty clear arithmetic progression from those who wanted to use microthreads, > > to those who wanted co-routines, to those who wanted just generators. The > > generator folks were probably 2/3 of the assembly. Looks as if many have > > decided, and they seem to agree with you. > > Here the exact facts of the poll: > > microthreads: 26 > co-routines: 35 > generators: 44 > > I think this reads a little different. Either you're misreading me or I'm misreading you, because your facts seem to *exactly* corroborate what I said. 26 -> 35 -> 44 is pretty much an arithmetic progression, and it's exactly in the direction I mentioned (microthreads -> co-routines -> generators), so what difference do you see? Of course my 2/3 number is a guess. 60 - 70 total people in the room strikes my memory rightly. Anyone else? -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4