Thomas Wouters wrote: > > I've never really believed in the 'true cross-platform nature' of Python, > mostly because I know it can't *really* be true. Most of my scripts are not > portably to non-UNIX platforms, due to the use of sockets, pipes, and > hardcoded filepaths (/usr/...). Even if I did, I can hardly agree that > because there is no portable way (if any at all) to find out howmany > diskspace is free, it isn't cross-platform. Just *because* it lacks that > function makes it more cross-platform: platforms might not have the concept > of 'free space' :) Hmm, that means we better strip the standard library off most of its modules (why not all?), because the less content there is, the more cross-platform it will be, right? Well, if the concept is not there, simply throw a neat ConceptException! ;-) Dinu
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4