On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 09:57:53PM -0800, Dan Wolfe wrote: > Question 1: I'm not geeky enough to understand why the '.3' get's > removed.... is there a problem with the SED script? or did I overlook > something? > Question 2: I noticed that all the other versions are > <OS><MajorRevision> also - is this intentional? or is this just a result > of the bug in the SED script I believe it's intentional. I'm pretty sure it'll break stuff if it's changed, in any case. It relies on the convention that the OS release numbers actually mean something: nothing serious changes when the minor version number is upped, so there is no need to have a separate architecture directory for it. > If someone can help me understand what's going on here, I'll be glad to > submit the patch to fix the fcntl module and a few others on Mac OS X. Are you sure the 'darwin1' arch name is really the problem ? As long as you have that directory, which should be filled by 'make Lib/plat-darwin1' and by 'make install' (but not by 'make test', unfortunately) it shouldn't matter. (So my guess is: you're doing configure, make, make test, and the plat-darwin1 directory isn't made then, so tests that rely (indirectly) on it will fail. Try using 'make plat-darwin1' before 'make test'.) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4