> FYI, I pointed a correspondent to Neil's new generator patch (among other > things), and got this back. Not being a Web Guy at heart, I don't have a > clue about XSLT (just enough to know that 4-letter acronyms are a webb > abomination <wink>). > > Note: in earlier correspondence, the generator idea didn't seem to "click" > until I called them "resumable functions" (as I often did in the past, but > fell out of the habit). People new to the concept often pick that up > quicker, or even, as in this case, remember that they once rolled such a > thing by hand out of prior necessity. > > Anyway, possibly food for thought if XSLT means something to you ... Quite interesting. I brought up this *exact* point at the Stackless BOF at IPC9. I mentioned that the immediate reason I was interested in Stackless was to supercharge the efficiency of 4XSLT. I think that a stackless 4XSLT could pretty much annihilate the other processors in the field for performance. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4