Tim Peters wrote: > > No: as my signoff line implied, switch to Windows and tell Tim to deal with > it. Works for everyone except me <wink>! I was just tweaking you. For a > patch on SF, it should be enough to just attach the new files and leave a > comment saying where they belong. Well, I'm going to bite just one more time. As near as I could see, a patch on allows the submission of a single file. What I did to get around this (seemed obvious at the time) was put the contents of the file (because it was small) in the comment field and attach the "rest of the patch." Then I wanted to update the file but comments are added, not replace so changes were quickly going to become nasty. I'm just glad that the answer was sufficiently subtle that it generated a new thread. I didn't miss anything obvious. :) -- Take a recipe. Leave a recipe. Python Cookbook! http://www.activestate.com/pythoncookbook
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4