> I'm in favor of some combination of 2) and 3). So let's try this out: Is it ok to include the new fields on range objects in 2.0.1? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4