On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 03:37:33AM -0800, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
> ... it looks like it would be similer to put this code in the
> switch statement.
Um, no. Bad idea. Even if I could restructure the loop, try/finally
blocks mess everything up anyhow.
After searching through many megabytes of python-dev archives (grepmail
is my friend), I finally found the posts Tim was referring me to
(Subject: Generator details, Date: July 1999). Guido and Tim already
had the answer for me. Now:
import sys
def g():
for n in range(10):
suspend n, sys._getframe()
return None, None
n, frame = g()
while frame:
print n
n, frame = frame.resume()
merrily prints 0 to 9 on stdout. Whee!
Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4