[Martin] > I have to following specific questions: If a patch is accepted, should > it be closed also? If so, how should the resolution change if it is > also committed? [Guido] > A patch should only be closed after it has been committed; otherwise > it's too easy to lose track of it. So I guess the proper sequence is > > 1. accept; Resolution set to Accepted > > 2. commit; Status set to Closed > > I hope the owner of the sf-faq document can fix it. Heh -- there is no such person. Since I wrote that Appendix to begin with, I checked in appropriate changes: yes, status should be Open if and only if something still needs to be done (even if that's only a commit); status should be Closed or Deleted if and only if nothing more should ever be done.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4