> But most probably, it will run interpreters from time to time. > These can be told to take the scheduling role on. You'll have to expand on that. My understanding is that all the uthreads would have to run in a single C-level interpreter invocation which can never be allowed to return. I don't see how different interpreters can be made to "take on" this role. If that were possible, there wouldn't be any problem in the first place. > It does not matter on which interpreter level we are, > we just can't switch to frames of other levels. But > even leaving a frame chain, and re-entering later > with a different stack level is no problem. You'll have to expand on that, too. Those two sentences sound contradictory to me. Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4