> skip wrote: > > I suggest dumping the patch release concept and just going with bug fix > > releases. The system will be complex enough without them. If it proves > > desirable later, you can always add them. > > agreed. +1 > > Applying sre 2.1 to the 2.0 source would probably be reasonably easy. > > Adding it to 1.5.2 would be much more difficult (no Unicode), and so > > would quite possibly be accepted by the 2.0 RS and rejected by the > > 1.5.2 RS. > > footnote: SRE builds and runs just fine under 1.5.2: > > http://www.pythonware.com/products/sre In the specific case of SRE, I'm +1 on keeping the code base in 2.0.1 completely synchronized with 2.1. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4