Hi.
First of all I should admit I ignore what have been discussed
at IPC9 about Stackless Python.
My plain question (as jython developer): is there a real intention
to make python stackless in the short term (2.2, 2.3...)=0D?
AFAIK then for jython there are three option:
1 - Just don't care
2 - A major rewrite with performance issues (but AFAIK nobody has
the resources for doing that)
3 - try to implement some of the highlevel offered features through threads
(which could be pointless from a performance point of view:
e.g. microthreads trough threads, not that nice).
=20
The option are 3 just for the theoretical sake of compatibility=20
(I don't see the point to port python stackless based code to jython)
or 1 plus some amount of frustration <wink>. Am I missing something?
The problem will be more serious if the std lib will begin to use
heavily the stackless features.
regards, Samuele Pedroni.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4