A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-March/013549.html below:

[Stackless] comments on PEP 219

[Python-Dev] Re: [Stackless] comments on PEP 219 [Python-Dev] Re: [Stackless] comments on PEP 219Skip Montanaro skip@pobox.com (Skip Montanaro)
Tue, 13 Mar 2001 21:12:02 -0600 (CST)
>>>>> "Gordon" == Gordon McMillan <gmcm@hypernet.com> writes:

    Gordon> No one's asking them to give up __init__. Just asking them not
    Gordon> to transfer control from inside an __init__. There are good
    Gordon> reasons not to transfer control to another thread from within an
    Gordon> __init__, too.
 
Is this same restriction placed on all "magic" methods like __getitem__?  Is
this the semantic difference between Stackless and CPython that people are
getting all in a lather about?

Skip






RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4