Moshe Zadka wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Paul Prescod <paulp@ActiveState.com> wrote: > > > Whether or not Python adopts rationals as the default number type, a > > rational() built-in would be a Good Thing. I'd like to see it in 2.1 or > > 2.2. > > OK, how about this: > > 1. I remove the "literals" part from my PEP to another PEP > 2. I add to rational() an ability to take strings, such as "1.3" and > make rationals out of them +1 -- Python: Programming the way Guido indented it. - (originated with Skip Montanaro?)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4