Guido van Rossum wrote: > Here's another sweet and short PEP. What do folks think? Is > xrange()'s complexity really worth having? Are there still known bugs that will take some effort to repair? Is xrange constantly touched when changes are made elsewhere? If no to both, then I suggest don't fix what ain't broken; life is too short. (Unless it is annoying you to distraction, then do the deed and get it over with.)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4