Hi. [Armin Rigo] ... > Why it is related to Psyco: the current treatment of globals/builtins makes > it hard for Psyco to statically tell what function we are calling when it > sees e.g. "len(a)" in the code. We would at least need some help from the > interpreter; at least hooks called when the module's globals() dictionary > change. The above proposal might provide a more uniform solution. > FYI, a different proposal for opt. globals access by Jeremy Hylton. It seems, it would break fewer things ... don't know whether it can be as useful for Psyco: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-May/014995.html In any case I think Psyco will need notification support from the interpreter about dynamic changes to things that Psyco honestly assumes to be invariant in order to achieve performance. regards, Samuele Pedroni.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4