> > # If you redistribute the SOFTWARE and/or your Source Modifications, > > # or any portion thereof as provided above, you agree: (i) to > > # distribute the SOFTWARE only in conjunction with, and as part of, > > # your Source Modifications which add significant functionality to the > > # SOFTWARE; (ii) to distribute the SOFTWARE and/or your Source > > # Modifications solely as part of your research and not in any > > # commercial product; (iii) the SOFTWARE and/or your Source > > # Modifications will not be distributed for profit; (iv) to retain all > > # branding, copyright and trademark notices included with the SOFTWARE > > # and include a copy of this EULA with any distribution of the > > # SOFTWARE, or any portion thereof; and (v) to indemnify, hold > > # harmless, and defend Microsoft from and against any claims or > > # lawsuits, including attorneys' fees, that arise or result from > > # the use or distribution of your Source Modifications. > > > > I don't know whether this is acceptable or not. > > Most likely not: there are lots of commercial Python users out there > who wouldn't like these clauses at all... we'd also lose the GPL > compatibility. Don't even *think* about using code with that license. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4