> > I still think adding them to the core is okay, but that's me. > > What would be the threshold for doing so ? > > Tamito is actively working on reducing the table sizes of the the > codecs and after what I have seen you do on these sort of tables I > am pretty sure Tamito can turn these tables into shared libs which are > smaller than 200k. But isn't this set only one of the many possible Asian codecs? I would have no objection to one 200k module, but if we really wanted to handle "asian codecs" I believe this is only the start. For this reason, I would give a -0 to adding these to the core, and a +1 to adding them to the directory structure proposed by Guido. Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4