Hello everybody, For comparison purposes, I implemented the idea of optimizing PyArg_ParseTuple calls by modifying the C code itself. Here is the result: http://homepages.ulb.ac.be/~arigo/pyarg_pp.tgz I did not upload this as a patch at SourceForge for several reasons. The most fundamental is that it raises bootstrapping issues: how can we compile the Python interpreter if we first have to run a Python script on the source files ? Fixing this would make the Makefiles significantly more complex. The other reason is that the METH_O solution is probably still faster, as it often completely avoids to build the 1-tuple of arguments. More serious performance tests might be needed, however. A bientot, Armin.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4