Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-June/015306.html below:

could int, str, tuple etc. become type objects?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] quick poll: could int, str, tuple etc. become type objects?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] quick poll: could int, str, tuple etc. become type objects?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Adding the atomic types of python as classes I'm +1 on.

Perfomance is a problem for the parser to handle.

If you have not already done so I suggest that you look at
what MicroSoft .NET is doing in this area. In .NET, for example,
int is a class and they have the technology to define the
interface to an int and optimize the performace of the none
derived cases.

		Barry
	

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] quick poll: could int, str, tuple etc. become type objects?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] quick poll: could int, str, tuple etc. become type objects?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4