>> I guess one could argue that extension writers should check >> for narrow/wide builds in their extensions before using Unicode. >> >> Since the number of Unicode extension writers is much smaller >> than the number of users, I think that this apporach would be >> reasonable, provided that we document the problem clearly in the >> NEWS file. > OK. I approve. I'm not sure I can follow. What did you approve? That extension writers should check whether their Unicode build matches the one they get at run-time? How are they going to do that? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4