Obviously, just as the new design is aiming at Perl 6, it would be aiming at Python 3. Nothing's impossible these days, so I am keeping an open mind. I expect that in addition to the bytecode, the entire runtime architecture would have to be shared though for this to make sense, and I'm not sure how easy that would be, even if Perl is willing to be flexible. Most of Python's run-time semantics are very carefully defined and shouldn't be changed in order to fit in the common runtime. I'm looking forward to Eric's comparison of the two run-time systems. (Eric, be sure to use a copy of 2.2a1 or the descr-branch -- *don't* use the CVS trunk.) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4