Tim Peters wrote:
>
> Here's your chance to prove your favorite platform isn't a worthless pile of
> monkey crap <wink>. Please run the attached. If it prints anything other
> than
>
> 0 failures in 10000 tries
>
> it will probably print a lot. In that case I'd like to know which flavor of
> C+libc+libm you're using, and the OS; a few of the failures it prints may be
> helpful too.
Successful with Python 2.0 on NetBSD (unknown CPU) and Win98SE with
Athlon.
--
--- Aahz (@pobox.com)
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 <*> http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het Pythonista
I don't really mind a person having the last whine, but I do mind someone
else having the last self-righteous whine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4