Moshe Zadka wrote:
> No, instead of:
>
>
> class concat:
>
> def __init__(self, *iterators):
> self.iterators = list(iterators)
>
> def __iter__(self): return self
>
> def next(self):
> while self.iterators:
> try:
> return self.iterators[0].next()
> except StopIteration:
> del self.iterators[0]
> else:
> raise StopIteration
>
>
> for x in concat(iter1, iter2):
> do_something(x)
Or:
from __future__ import generators
def concat(*iterators):
for i in iterators:
for x in i:
yield x
for x in concat(iter1, iter2):
do_something(x)
Just
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4