On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:46:45AM -0400, Guido van Rossum wrote: > But isn't the whole point of UTF-16 to fool code that believes it's > manipulating UCS-2 into a false sense of security? :-) Well, sort of. More like fooling into a true sense of insecurity. :) Anyway, the Standard sez that a conforming UCS-2 application will not use characters in the surrogates area. Future versions of ISO10646 and the Unicode Standard will probably require UTF-16 instead of UCS-2. Simon
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4