A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-July/016120.html below:

[Python-Dev] Please have a look at proposed doc changes for time epoch

[Python-Dev] Please have a look at proposed doc changes for time epoch [Python-Dev] Please have a look at proposed doc changes for time epochGuido van Rossum guido@digicool.com
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:44:18 -0400
> Personally, I think adding mx.DateTime to the core wouldn't be a bad idea.

I've heard this endorsement before.  It looks a bit too unwieldy to
me, but it might be a good starting point for something truly
Pythonic.

> Python's date manipulation code is in need of some more cojones.  2.2 is
> probably too near, but that's ultimately for the PythonLabs folks to decide.

No, there's plenty of time to add this to 2.2.

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4