On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 08:10:08AM -0400, Guido van Rossum wrote: >Untrue: it supports range(0x110000) (in UCS-2 mode this returns a >surrogate pair). Now, maybe that's not what it *should* do... I formed the impression that all of the UCS-4 and surrogate work was for the goal of supporting ISO 10646 (or whatever the number is -- you know, the 31-bit character set), so everything is written with that assumption. Presumably that's wrong. Is ISO 10646 on the roadmap at this point, or is it completely irrelevant? Your other corrections will get applied; thanks! --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4