guido wrote: > But MAL and PaulP don't seem to agree on the semantics of this > directive and I don't agree with either of them. the encoding should apply to the entire source file, and there are lots of tricky issues related to source code embedding (e.g. python code in XML) and encoding-aware transports (e.g. python code over HTTP) that needs to be covered. > and I haven't gotten a good answer why we can't do that > with a magic comment. probably because we can ;-) I'm on vacation; assuming neither encodings nor directives will go into 2.2a1, I prepare a counter-PEP when I have some time to spare (not today, most likely). </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4