Thomas Wouters wrote: > In other words: it's a mess. It sure is. You don't want to change the DB implementation used if it worked in 2.1. I believe that different DBs use different storage formats. People would not be happy if they upgraded to a point release and all their DBs broke (i.e. with 2.1 dbm was actually gdbm but with 2.1.1 it is db1). Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4