[Skip Montanaro] > It's that adjective "meaningful" that makes it difficult... Obviously > pystone wouldn't be meaningful since it doesn't do much string stuff. pystone is always meaningful, and *especially* when "it shouldn't" change but does anyway <0.4 wink>. For example, while staring at strings, you may miss that other kinds of + slow down. > I tried timing the following: > > PYTHONPATH= time ./python -tt ../Lib/test/regrtest.py -l > > after making sure the .py[co] files were deleted. I got "102.96user > 1.47system" before and "103.24user 1.57system" after. I'm afraid this is useless except to get the sense of highly significant changes: several of the tests do a varying amount of work depending on results from random.py (which initializes itself from system time when it's first imported). pystone is the only shared "speed benchmark" we have.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4